Skip to main content

When it comes to payment for physical therapist services, neither APTA nor its state chapters can negotiate rates with payers. Due to antitrust laws, negotiating rates is solely the purview of the individual provider. What APTA and your state chapter can and do provide, however, are guidance, tools, resources, and information on aspects of the payment process. These include identifying practice costs, knowing what to look for in a contractual agreement, and advocating for the value of physical therapist services in improving the overall health of individuals served by physical therapists (PTs) and physical therapist assistants (PTAs).

Unlike federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance companies—for example, Cigna or Aetna—are not bound by laws or regulations that dictate how they establish rates. The company is considered a private entity that is entering into a contract with another private entity (the practice) and is free to negotiate the rate it sees fit. Keep in mind that issues with provider agreements are not always specific to payment rates. Some payers allow for fair and appropriate payment, but other clauses within the agreement may affect providers' bottom line, involving administrative processes, denial and appeal efforts, preauthorization, and claims adjudication.

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.


Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.


You Might Also Like...

News

Get Regular Insights on Regulatory, Legislative, and Payment Issues From APTA

Apr 17, 2024

Free to members, APTA's webinar series delivers crucial information in an easy-to-understand format. Register now for upcoming sessions.

News

New Member Benefit Makes It Easy to Track Chapter-Relevant State Legislation

Apr 3, 2024

The APTA State Advocacy Map is an easy, interactive resource that helps you track and receive updates on bills APTA chapters are following.

News

CMS Unveils New, High-Priced Restrictions on Access to Medicare, Medicaid Data

Mar 1, 2024

APTA and researchers across the country oppose the new policy, which could have a chilling effect on needed research.