By using this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more visit our privacy policy.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Summary
What it measures:
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. KOOS is used for any knee pathology and was found to be useful in assessing patients of various age populations, ranging from young to elderly adults.(1)
- A short version - KOOS-12: 12-item short form(6) was developed as well
- KOOS has been translated and validated in many languages(1): Spanish(13,19), Persian(7,10), Dutch(8,11,18,21), French(2) and Swedish(4)
Target Population:
KOOS has been used with a variety of pathologies and populations.
Conditions and Test Variations Included in This Summary:
- ACL tear/reconstruction( 1,7,8,9)
- Meniscus injury(10)
- Knee osteoarthritis(1,4,11,12)
- Knee ligament injury(2,13)
- Focal cartilage lesion(1,14-17)
- Total knee arthroplasty(18-20 )
- Joint replacement for osteoarthritis(4,11,7)
- Normative data for healthy individuals(2)
Variations of KOOS listed below were developed to create an outcome measure that is specific for a population or condition.
KOOS-PF: specific to patellofemoral syndrome(6)
KOOS-PS: physical function short form(6)
KOOS-Child: specific for children with knee injuries(6)
KOOS-JR: specific for joint replacement(6)
Clinical Insights
- KOOS scores will have significant variation in individuals who are considered obese with BMI ranging from 35-66. (26) These individuals will have worse outcome scores in subscales regarding pain, activities of daily living, sport, and quality of life. (26)
- For patients with recent and ACL ruptures and reconstruction (within 1 year), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is considered to be more useful than KOOS. (8)
- In patients with OA awaiting TKA, mean age of 71.3 years, KOOS may have better ability to predict improvement in the subscales of pain and sports/recreation than WOMAC. (4)
- In patients with OA who had TKA, mean age of 71.3 years, KOOS is better in detecting improvements over time than WOMAC. (4)
- Compared with WOMAC, KOOS is better adapted for younger, more active populations and is better in detecting smaller effect size from interventions, detecting changeover a longer period of time, and detecting change in physical function. (4)
- KOOS subscales of sports/recreation and quality of life make it a more responsive measure than WOMAC or SF-36 in the younger and/or more active populations.(5)
- KOOS is a validated and reliable outcome measure for elderly individuals with advanced osteoarthritis. (4)
- KOOS is a validated and reliable outcome measure for people undergoing ACL reconstruction, with a mean age of 32 years. (5)
- In patients with knee injuries and/or OA, age range from 18 to 84 years, age and gender matched reference values of KOOS are recommended to be used in evaluating the effects of interventions. (25)
- A further evaluation of the clinimetric proper, ties in subgroups, such as age and gender, would be of great value to provide self-administered questionnaires for patient-specific subpopulations. (16)
- The findings will have to be confirmed by further studies evaluating other subpopulations (eg, men and women, young and elderly) before generalizations are applicable. Comparison of the baseline data obtained in the 2 samples suggests that the instrument allows discrimination between patients with different levels of knee OA severity. (12)
- A limitation of KOOS is it doesn't account for history of knee injury, disease, or general health, and it does not account for age, sex, and activity level. (2)
- KOOS is sensitive in detecting clinical changes. (20)
ICF Domain(s):
- Body Structure and Function
- Activity
- Participation
ICF Categories:
- Mobility: Walking & Moving Around
- Changing & Maintaining Body Position
- Carrying, Moving, & Handling Objects
- Self-Care
- Recreation and Leisure
Members Only Content
Join APTA to get unlimited access to content including evidence-based research, guidance on payment changes, and other resources to help you thrive. Learn more about membership benefits.
Already a member? Log in
Date: October 7, 2020
Contact: practice@apta.org
Content Type: Test & Measure
Fritzi QuiƱones, SPT; Maria Rousseva, SPT; Joshua Makkappallil, SPT; Kenneth L. Miller, PT, DPT, MA; Kathleen A. Luedtke-Hoffmann, PT, MBA, PhD
Haley Worst, PT, DPT Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy; Kate Spencer PT, DPT Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy
You Might Also Like...
CPG
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Acute Isolated Meniscal Pathology: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelineJun 10, 2024
This clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons provides the best evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of acute
Clinical Summary
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) InjuryMay 22, 2024
Physical therapy interventions can increase the chances that the patient will return to preinjury activity levels and prevent a recurrence.
CPG
EULAR Recommendations for the Non-Pharmacological Core Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: 2023 UpdateMay 15, 2024
These updated multidisciplinary recommendations focus on the nonpharmacological management of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA).